Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. John K. Hamblin, for appellant, cites: Mandamus proper to control discretion of public officers only when discretion abused: 130 S.C. 337; 81 S.C. 416; 2 McC., 170; 4 Burr, 2186; 100 U.S. 339; 25 L.Ed., 676; 74 U.S. 364; 19 L.Ed., 214; 9 Wheat, 529; 6 L.Ed., 152; 45 S.E., 994; 139 Mo., 560; 61 A.S.R., 474; 76 Cal., 545; 9 A.S. R., 249; 13 N.E., 201. Appeals from South Carolina Tax Commission to State Board of Review: Civ. Code, 1922, Sec. 369. Tax Commission limited to powers given by Legislature: 113 S.C. 376. Tax Commission without right to change its decision of its own motion: 89 S.C. 478; 88 S.C. 474; 42 L.Ed., 953; 38 L.Ed., 269; 15 A. E. Enc. of Law, 2nd Ed., 1046; 1 Wall, 175; 3 Wall, 294; 9 Wall, 50; 16 Wall, 678. Messrs. Elliott McLain, for respondent, Emslie Nicholson, cite: Right of appeal should be construed liberally: 128 S.E., 360. Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, and J. Fraser Lyon, for respondent, South Carolina Tax Commission.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. John K. Hamblin, for appellant, cites: Mandamus proper to control discretion of public officers only when discretion abused: 130 S.C. 337; 81 S.C. 416; 2 McC., 170; 4 Burr, 2186; 100 U.S. 339; 25 L.Ed., 676; 74 U.S. 364; 19 L.Ed., 214; 9 Wheat, 529; 6 L.Ed., 152; 45 S.E., 994; 139 Mo., 560; 61 A.S.R., 474; 76 Cal., 545; 9 A.S. R., 249; 13 N.E., 201. Appeals from South Carolina Tax Commission to State Board of Review: Civ. Code, 1922, Sec. 369. Tax Commission limited to powers given by Legislature: 113 S.C. 376. Tax Commission without right to change its decision of its own motion: 89 S.C. 478; 88 S.C. 474; 42 L.Ed., 953; 38 L.Ed., 269; 15 A. E. Enc. of Law, 2nd Ed., 1046; 1 Wall, 175; 3 Wall, 294; 9 Wall, 50; 16 Wall, 678. Messrs. Elliott McLain, for respondent, Emslie Nicholson, cite: Right of appeal should be construed liberally: 128 S.E., 360. Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, and J. Fraser Lyon, for respondent, South Carolina Tax Commission.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

BETENBAUGH, AUDITOR, v. S.C. TAX COMMISSION ET AL.

April 5, 1926. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE R.O. PURDY.

The nature of the controversy and a full statement of the facts are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham. The reasoning of his Honor and the conclusions reached by him are satisfactory to this Court in the disposition of the matter at issue. The exceptions to his decree are, therefore, overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Let the decree of his Honor, Judge Bonham, be reported.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, COTHRAN, BLEASE and STABLER concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BETENBAUGH, AUDITOR, v. S.C. TAX COMM
(Apr 5, 1926)