Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EARL J. CLARK, Appellant.

WASTE, C.J.

The defendant, Earl J. Clark, was convicted in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles of the crime of murder in the first degree, and judgment was pronounced and entered against him, sentencing him to be hanged. An appeal from that judgment to this court has been submitted, and is pending decision herein.

It now appears from the affidavit of William I. Traeger, sheriff of the county of Los Angeles, that the defendant, Clark, on or about the sixteenth day of March, 1926, escaped from the county jail in the county of Los Angeles, wherein he was confined. He has not since been apprehended, and is now a fugitive from justice. Supported by the affidavit of the sheriff, in whose custody the defendant was held, relating these facts, the attorney-general, by motion, asks this court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the defendant, Clark, has escaped from custody and is now at large.

Upon the authority of People v. Redinger, 55 Cal. 290 [36 Am. Rep. 32], and People v. Elkins, 122 Cal. 654 [55 P. 599], it is ordered that the appeal of said Earl J. Clark in this case be and the same stand dismissed unless the defendant, within thirty days from this date, return to the custody of the sheriff of the county of Los Angeles, state of California.

It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served upon the attorney for the defendant within five days hereof.

Seawell, J., Shenk, J., Nourse, J., pro tem., Richards, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CLARK
(Apr 7, 1926)