Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KING CUDJO v. STATE.

(Syllabus.) Searches and Seizures — Immunity of Private Residence. A private residence is immune from search and seizure unless a showing is made by affidavit that such residence or some portion of it is a store, rooming house, a place of storage, or a place of public resort.

BESSEY, P.J.

King Cudjo, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the illegal possession of a still and mash fit for distillation. By verdict of the jury his punishment was fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 90 days. From the judgment on this verdict he appeals.

The evidence upon which this conviction rests was procured by means of a search warrant issued upon an affidavit which was not sufficient to give the magistrate jurisdiction to issue it. A private residence is immune from search and seizure, unless a showing is made by sufficient affidavit that the residence or a portion of it is a store, rooming house, place of storage, or a place of public resort. No such showing was made in this case.

The cause is reversed, with instructions to dismiss the action.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CUDJO v. STATE
(May 8, 1926)