Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Aubrey HAUGHN et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in error were the master and crew of the British schooner Hazel E. Herman, which was seized on September 23, 1925, by the Coast Guard at a point 16 marine miles off the coast of Louisiana. They were convicted of violations of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138¼ et seq.), alleged to have occurred at said time and place.

Various errors are assigned, of which it is necessary to consider only those running to the overruling of a motion for a directed verdict. The facts are similar to those appearing in the case of Hennings v. United States, 13 F.2d 74, decided this day. The motion to direct should have been granted.

Reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAUGHN v. UNITED STATES
(May 12, 1926)