Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Respondent, v. SOLOMON MILLER, Respondent, and JACOB REISBERG, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the impleaded defendant Reisberg was improper, as any judgment under subdivision 2, section 193 of the Civil Practice Act against such defendant should run in favor only of the defendant originally joined. ( Bozzuffi v. Darrieusecq, 125 Misc. 178.) The judgment is, therefore, modified so as to read in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Miller and in favor of the defendant Miller against the impleaded defendant Reisberg, and thus affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff.

All concur; present, DELEHANTY, LYDON and LEVY, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OTIS ELEVATOR CO. v. MILLER
(Jun 8, 1926)