SUMTER TRUST CO. v. SUMTER COUNTY et al

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12043

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Lee Moise, for appellant, cite: "Subrogation" defined: 120 S.C. 56. Case distinguished: 114 S.C. 323. Defendant surety company failed to give notice of assignment; estoppel: 31 A.L.R., 876; 66 L.R.A., 760. Messrs. Nelson Mullins, for respondent, Union Indemnity Company, cite: Legal and conventional subrogation: 49 Minn., 386; 25 R.C.L., 1312. Surety performing obligation of principal entitled to subrogation to rights against principal: 68 S.C. 436; 208 U.S. 404; 52 L.Ed., 547; 164 U.S. 227; 41 L.Ed., 412; 4 F.2d 810; 240 F., 400; 153 C.C.A., 326; 215 F., 45; 114 F., 529; 52 C.C. A., 313; 71 N.J. Eq., 657; 65 A., 466; 148 N.W., 55; 172 P., 126; L.R.A., 1918-D, 732. Surety's right to subrogation dates from execution of contract: 68 S.C. 436; 208 U.S. 404; 52 L.Ed., 547; 164 U.S. 227; 41 L.Ed., 412; 172 P., 126; L.R.A., 1918-B, 732; 4 F.2d 810. Equitable assignments: 114 S.C. 207; 103 S.E., 499; 8 F.2d 446. Plaintiff not entitled to subrogation: 99 Neb. 785; 157 N.W., 924. Elements necessary to constitute equitable estoppel: 16 Cyc., 750 and 756. Duty of party dealing with agent to inquire into his authority: 21 R.C. L., 908. Priorities between successive assignees of chose in action: 264 U.S. 182; 31 A.L.R., 876. Same; South Carolina rule: 57 S.C. 481; 38 S.C. 147; 22 S.C. 29; 4 Rich. Eq., 105; 2 Pomeroy's Eq. Jur., 4th Ed., Sec. 687.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12043

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Lee Moise, for appellant, cite: "Subrogation" defined: 120 S.C. 56. Case distinguished: 114 S.C. 323. Defendant surety company failed to give notice of assignment; estoppel: 31 A.L.R., 876; 66 L.R.A., 760. Messrs. Nelson Mullins, for respondent, Union Indemnity Company, cite: Legal and conventional subrogation: 49 Minn., 386; 25 R.C.L., 1312. Surety performing obligation of principal entitled to subrogation to rights against principal: 68 S.C. 436; 208 U.S. 404; 52 L.Ed., 547; 164 U.S. 227; 41 L.Ed., 412; 4 F.2d 810; 240 F., 400; 153 C.C.A., 326; 215 F., 45; 114 F., 529; 52 C.C. A., 313; 71 N.J. Eq., 657; 65 A., 466; 148 N.W., 55; 172 P., 126; L.R.A., 1918-D, 732. Surety's right to subrogation dates from execution of contract: 68 S.C. 436; 208 U.S. 404; 52 L.Ed., 547; 164 U.S. 227; 41 L.Ed., 412; 172 P., 126; L.R.A., 1918-B, 732; 4 F.2d 810. Equitable assignments: 114 S.C. 207; 103 S.E., 499; 8 F.2d 446. Plaintiff not entitled to subrogation: 99 Neb. 785; 157 N.W., 924. Elements necessary to constitute equitable estoppel: 16 Cyc., 750 and 756. Duty of party dealing with agent to inquire into his authority: 21 R.C. L., 908. Priorities between successive assignees of chose in action: 264 U.S. 182; 31 A.L.R., 876. Same; South Carolina rule: 57 S.C. 481; 38 S.C. 147; 22 S.C. 29; 4 Rich. Eq., 105; 2 Pomeroy's Eq. Jur., 4th Ed., Sec. 687.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

SUMTER TRUST CO. v. SUMTER COUNTY ET AL.

August 6, 1926. The opinion of the Court was rendered by

MR. JUSTICE BLEASE.

It is the judgment of this Court that the decree of his Honor, J.K. Henry, Circuit Judge, which will be reported in full, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, COTHRAN and STABLER concur.

MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE R.O. PURDY disqualified.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.