BAUS v. TRENTON AND MERCER, c., CORP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the respondent, Martin P.
For the appellant, Edward L.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the respondent, Martin P.
For the appellant, Edward L.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LEONARD BAUS, RESPONDENT, v. TRENTON AND MERCER COUNTY TRACTION CORPORATION,APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, JJ. 7.

For reversal — KATZENBACH, WHITE, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 4.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BAUS v. TRENTON AND MERCER, c., CORP

LEONARD BAUS, RESPONDENT, v. TRENTON AND MERCER COUNTY TRACTION CORPORATION,APPELLANT.

Comments