Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

John Carlton DYSART, Petitioner, v. W.A. BOYNTON, United States District Judge, and John D. Hartman, United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

It not appearing that any proposed bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge during the term of the court at which petitioner was tried, or during the further time allowed by any order made in that regard, the petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DYSART v. BOYNTON
(Nov 3, 1926)