Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Joe VINT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.

PER CURIAM.

This is a prosecution for violation of section 3 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138½aa), in that the defendant had in his possession intoxicating liquors contrary to law, and for having been previously convicted on two separate occasions of similar offenses.

We have given careful consideration to the assignments of error alleged, and find the action of the District Court free from objection, and the same is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VINT v. UNITED STATES
(Nov 16, 1926)