Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THOMASSON v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

As far as we have been able to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have found no error. We have been unable to review most of the questions raised by this application, for the reason that such review would involve inquiries of fact, such as this court has heretofore in numerous cases refused to indulge. Postal Telegraph, etc., v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMASSON v. STATE
(Nov 26, 1926)