Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JULIANNA GENGLER et al. Appellees, vs. JAMES H. HOOPER et al. — (JAMES H. HOOPER, Appellant.)

Mr. JUSTICE HEARD delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellees filed their bill of complaint in chancery in the circuit court of Cook county alleging that they were the owners of certain real estate in that county, praying that a bailiff's deed issued to Bertha F. Hooper, and a quit-claim deed from her to James H. Hooper, be set aside and canceled. Answers were filed thereto, and upon a hearing a decree was entered setting aside the deeds in accordance with the prayer of the bill. The record is now before this court upon appeal.

No findings of fact were made by the court in the decree, and the transcript of the record of the circuit court does not show that the evidence was preserved by a certificate of evidence or report of a master in chancery, nor is it supported by a verdict of a jury. Appellant assigns as error the entry of a decree for affirmative relief not based upon any findings of fact contained therein or upon evidence properly preserved.

In chancery it is incumbent upon the party in whose favor a decree granting relief is entered, to preserve in the record the evidence justifying the decree. The general finding that all the material allegations in the bill are proved and that the equities of the case are with the complainant will not sustain a decree granting relief where there is no finding of specific facts and the evidence is not preserved in the record by a certificate of evidence, the report of a master in chancery finding the facts, or the verdict of a jury. Ohman v. Ohman, 233 Ill. 632; VanMeter v. Malchef, 276 id. 451; Akin v. Akin, 268 id. 324.

The decree of the circuit court must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENGLER v. HOOPER
(Dec 23, 1926)