Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMALIA R. GLUCK and her husband et al., complainants-appellants, v. RYNDADEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al., defendants-respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Vice-Chancellor Berry, who heard this case in the court of chancery, advised a decree dismissing the complainants' bill of complaint.

Our reading of the record leads us to the same conclusion as that of the learned vice-chancellor. We agree with the findings of fact as made by the vice-chancellor. We also agree with his application of the legal principles.

The decree of the court of chancery dismissing the complainants' bill is therefore affirmed and the decree is in all other respects affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GLUCK v. RYNDA DEVELOPMENT CO
(Jan 31, 1927)