Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JONES, TREAS. v. RALSTON ET AL.

Supreme Court — Insufficient record for review — Bill of exceptions and assignment of errors.

This cause was admitted to this court on motion to certify the record. Later a motion was made by the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error on the ground that no bill of exceptions had been allowed and that the assignments of error were not properly presented by the pleadings and the journal entries. Thereafter upon motion of plaintiff in error a continuance was granted to permit a further application in the Court of Appeals to incorporate the findings of fact in the journal entry of that court. The Court of Appeals denied the relief sought. The cause therefore stands in this court without sufficient record to present the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error. The motion to dismiss the petition in error will therefore be sustained.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE, ROBINSON, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONES v. RALSTON
(Mar 29, 1927)