Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ARMSTRONG v. HENSON.

March 24, 1927. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE BLEASE.

After a careful reading of the record in this cause, we are convinced that the decree of Hon. Edward McIver, deceased, Circuit Judge, was proper under all the circumstances. The decree will be reported in full.

The judgment of this Court is that all the exceptions be overruled, and that the decree of the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg county be and the same is hereby affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS, and MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN and STABLER, and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE PURDY concur.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN: I think that the case of Schmid v. Whitten is wrong in principal and should be distinctly overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARMSTRONG v. HENSON
(Mar 24, 1927)