Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Martin Blythe, for appellant, cite: Admissibility of evidence as to mental feelings or attitudes: Greenleaf on Ev. (16th Ed.), Sec. 162. Forfeiture of dower: Sec. 5237, Vol. 3, Code, 1922; 56 S.C. 173; 46 L.R.A., 517; 1 Bail., 312; A. E. Enc. L., Vol. 10 (2nd Ed.), 200; 19 C.J., 504. Messrs. Mauldin Love, for respondents, cite: Plaintiff barred of her dower right: Secs. 5237, 5333, Code; 125 S.C. 401; 123 S.C. 488; 110 S.E., 398. Cases distinguished: 56 S.C. 173; 1 Bail., 312.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Martin Blythe, for appellant, cite: Admissibility of evidence as to mental feelings or attitudes: Greenleaf on Ev. (16th Ed.), Sec. 162. Forfeiture of dower: Sec. 5237, Vol. 3, Code, 1922; 56 S.C. 173; 46 L.R.A., 517; 1 Bail., 312; A. E. Enc. L., Vol. 10 (2nd Ed.), 200; 19 C.J., 504. Messrs. Mauldin Love, for respondents, cite: Plaintiff barred of her dower right: Secs. 5237, 5333, Code; 125 S.C. 401; 123 S.C. 488; 110 S.E., 398. Cases distinguished: 56 S.C. 173; 1 Bail., 312.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MOORE v. ROBINSON ET AL.

April 12, 1927. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, M.M. Mann, Circuit Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed, and, for the reason that taking the testimony of the plaintiff appellant to be true, she is not entitled to recover, under Sections 5237 and 5333, Vol. 3 Code of Laws 1922.

Affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, STABLER and CARTER and ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE WHITING concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

MOORE v. ROBINSON et al
(Apr 12, 1927)