Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EX PARTE JAKE WRIGHT.

Habeas Corpus — To Secure Bail — No Statement of Facts — Practice on Appeal.

Where, on a habeas corpus hearing to secure bail, which is denied in the District Court, the record on appeal is without a statement of the evidence heard in the District Court, and the offense charged is a capital one, the action of trial judge in denying bail will be presumed to be justified by the facts before him.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —

This is an appeal from the order of the District Court denying bail.

It appears from the record that the relator was charged by indictment with the offense of rape. In the judgment and order of the District Court it appears that evidence was heard. No statement of the evidence heard is before this court. The indictment charges a capital offense, and the question of right to bail would depend upon the evidence heard. Not having the evidence before us we are not in a position to pass upon its sufficiency and must assume that the trial judge, in denying bail, was justified by the facts before him.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied and the relator ordered remanded to custody.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE JAKE WRIGHT
(Apr 27, 1927)