Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CUNNINGHAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MORGAN.

MASTER AND SERVANT. — Decision of Industrial Board as to willful misconduct of injured employee binding on Appellate Court. — In a proceeding by an injured employee for compensation, where the employer, by special answer, questioned claimant's right to an award because of his wilful misconduct and raised no other issue, the decision of the Industrial Board is binding on the Appellate Court if there was evidence to sustain the award.

REMY, J.

Appellee, having received an injury while in the employment of appellant, filed with the Industrial Board his application for compensation. Contending that appellee was not entitled to compensation because of wilful misconduct, within § 8 of the Compensation Act (Acts 1919 p. 158, § 9453 Burns 1926), appellant presented the issue by a special answer. No other issue being presented, a hearing resulted in an award for appellee, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The question was one of fact for the Industrial Board. There is competent evidence to sustain the award.

Affirmed.

Dausman, J., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CUNNINGHAM CONSTR. CO. v. MORGAN
(May 20, 1927)