Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Philadelphia, Appellant, v. Merchant E

Appeals — Affidavit of defense — Refusal of judgment — Error of law.

1. The appellate court will not reverse an order refusing to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, unless the action of the lower court clearly appears to have been based on a plain error of law.

Argued April 19, 1927.

PER CURIAM, May 9, 1927:

The court below refused to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and plaintiff has appealed. Without expressing or intimating any view on the several questions argued in the briefs, it is enough to say that this case falls within the rule that we do not reverse on appeals from orders such as the one now before us unless the action of the court below clearly appears to be based on a plain error of law; we cannot say this of the present order.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHILADELPHIA v. MERCHANT EVANS CO
(May 9, 1927)