Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

FANNY OEHLER AND WILLIAM OEHLER, APPELLANTS, v. L. BAMBERGER COMPANY, ACORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — PARKER, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, KALISCH, BLACK, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, DEAR, JJ. 6.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OEHLER v. L. BAMBERGER CO
(May 16, 1927)