REDDING v. PHENIX CITY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

4 Div. 280.

Attorney(S)

Frank M. de Graffenried, of Seale, for
With the exception of the ordinances of cities having a population of 100,000 or more, courts of general jurisdiction do not take judicial notice of municipal ordinances
no presumption can be indulged as to the existence of such ordinances, in the absence of both allegation
Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18
329, 92 So. 212. Roy L. Smith, of Phenix City, for
Brief did not reach the

Judges

RICE, J.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

4 Div. 280.

Attorney(S)

Frank M. de Graffenried, of Seale, for
With the exception of the ordinances of cities having a population of 100,000 or more, courts of general jurisdiction do not take judicial notice of municipal ordinances
no presumption can be indulged as to the existence of such ordinances, in the absence of both allegation
Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18
329, 92 So. 212. Roy L. Smith, of Phenix City, for
Brief did not reach the

Judges

RICE, J.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

REDDING v. PHENIX CITY.

RICE, J.

In a prosecution for the violation of the terms of a city ordinance, except in certain specified cases, of which this is not one (Acts 1915, p. 294), it is essential that the ordinance in question, properly authenticated, be introduced in evidence. Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18 Ala. App. 329, 92 So. 212. This was not done in this case, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

REDDING v. PHENIX CITY.

Comments