Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAX MARGOLIS, RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD ET AL., APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court directing the issuing of a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the municipal authorities to issue a permit to Margolis for the erection of a thirty-two-family apartment house upon land located within that municipality.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.

As was pointed out in the opinion promulgated at the present term in the case of Robert Realty Co. v. City of Orange, 103 N.J.L. 711, the validity of the judgment under review, it having been rendered several months before the adoption of the so-called zoning amendment to the state constitution, is not affected by that amendment.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARGOLIS v. MAPLEWOOD TWP
(Oct 17, 1927)