Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CHLOE TINSLEY v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM.

This was a civil action for damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff by reason of slipping into an uncovered or unguarded hole or excavation on North Elm Street. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed, assigning errors.

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered by the Court upon a former appeal, which is reported in 192 N.C. p. 597. This decision becomes the law of the case so far as the subsequent trial is concerned. Nobles v. Davenport, 185 N.C. 162; Mfg. Co. v. Hodgins, 192 N.C. 577.

After a careful examination of the record and briefs of counsel for the parties, the court is of the opinion that no error of law was committed upon the trial, and the judgment of the trial court is upheld.

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TINSLEY v. WINSTON-SALEM
(Nov 1, 1927)