Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

ROSE PACHTER, Respondent, v. HARRY PACHTER, Appellant. Re

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff's right to the sum sued for arises from the order made in her behalf in her action against the defendant for a judicial separation, which order awarded her temporary alimony. It was an order enforcible only in the action in which it was made and it was merged in the final judgment in that action. This action was not commenced until some six months after the entry of such final judgment.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PACHTER v. PACHTER
(Nov 11, 1927)