STEINMEYER v. MARINE HOTEL CORP

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12332

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Logan Grace, and John I. Cosgrove, for appellant, cite: What assumption of risk may be set up as a defense: 112 S.C. 544; 123 S.C. 207; 137 S.E., 198. Cases distinguished: 10 A.L.R., 1388; Id., 1396; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 110 S.C. 154. Messrs. Huger, Wilbur, Miller Mouzon, for respondent, cite: Assumption of risk: 10 A.L.R., 1388; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 10 A.L.R., 1396; 39 C.J., 766; 110 S.C. 153. Cases distinguished: 112 S.C. 541; 123 S.C. 199; 137 S.E., 198; 39 C.J., 945. Demurrer sustainable on facts of case: 94 S.E., 835; 110 S.C. 153; 58 S.C. 491; 80 S.C. 1; 64 S.C. 553; 69 S.C. 479. Fundamentals of assumption of risk and contributory negligence are the same: 18 R.C.L., 675; 66 S.C. 204.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12332

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Logan Grace, and John I. Cosgrove, for appellant, cite: What assumption of risk may be set up as a defense: 112 S.C. 544; 123 S.C. 207; 137 S.E., 198. Cases distinguished: 10 A.L.R., 1388; Id., 1396; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 110 S.C. 154. Messrs. Huger, Wilbur, Miller Mouzon, for respondent, cite: Assumption of risk: 10 A.L.R., 1388; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 10 A.L.R., 1396; 39 C.J., 766; 110 S.C. 153. Cases distinguished: 112 S.C. 541; 123 S.C. 199; 137 S.E., 198; 39 C.J., 945. Demurrer sustainable on facts of case: 94 S.E., 835; 110 S.C. 153; 58 S.C. 491; 80 S.C. 1; 64 S.C. 553; 69 S.C. 479. Fundamentals of assumption of risk and contributory negligence are the same: 18 R.C.L., 675; 66 S.C. 204.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STEINMEYER v. MARINE HOTEL CORPORATION.

December 13, 1927. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN.

The order of his Honor, Judge Featherstone, sustaining the defendant's demurrer to the complaint, is entirely satisfactory to this Court and is accordingly affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER, and CARTER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STEINMEYER v. MARINE HOTEL CORPORATION.

Comments