Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE v. H.M. ANDERSON. Reported in 217 N.W. 351.

When plea of guilty is withdrawn with leave of court it is not admissible in evidence at trial of substituted plea.

A plea of guilty which is withdrawn by leave of the court is not admissible upon the trial of the substituted plea of not guilty.

Criminal Law, 16 C.J. p. 631 n. 60.

See 22 R.C.L. 20; 3 R.C.L. Supp. 1230; 4 R.C.L. Supp. 1451.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a judgment. Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U.S. 274 U.S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted.

Reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ANDERSON
(Dec 31, 1927)