Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Hamilton Jones, of Evergreen, for appellant. Charge A should have been given for defendant. Code 1923, §§ 4644, 5635; 1 R. C. L. 165, 166. See Davidson v. State, 33 Ala. 350. No complaint was filed by the solicitor, and the record is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. There is no merit in the assignment that no complaint was filed by the solicitor. Code 1923, § 4646. Evidence by the party to whom defendant sold whisky was admissible. Charge A does not correctly state the law. Burt v. State, 20 Ala. App. 296, 101 So. 768.
Judges
  • RICE, J.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Hamilton Jones, of Evergreen, for appellant. Charge A should have been given for defendant. Code 1923, §§ 4644, 5635; 1 R. C. L. 165, 166. See Davidson v. State, 33 Ala. 350. No complaint was filed by the solicitor, and the record is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. There is no merit in the assignment that no complaint was filed by the solicitor. Code 1923, § 4646. Evidence by the party to whom defendant sold whisky was admissible. Charge A does not correctly state the law. Burt v. State, 20 Ala. App. 296, 101 So. 768.
Judges
  • RICE, J.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

BARLOW v. STATE.

RICE, J.

It was unnecessary to file a complaint in the circuit court, but, on appeal from the county court, the prosecution might proceed under the original affidavit. Code 1923, § 4646.

The court may never tell the jury how they shall consider testimony. Hence appellant's written charge A was properly refused.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BARLOW v. STATE
(Jan 10, 1928)