Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Guy W. Winn, of Clayton, for petitioner. There was no evidence against the defendant and the affirmative charge requested by him should have been given. Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511; Hobdy v. State, 20 Ala. App. 44, 100 So. 571; Moultrie v. State, 20 Ala. App. 258, 101 So. 335. Where there is no evidence connecting the defendant with the crime charged, this presents a question of law which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court on certiorari. Postal Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief did not reach the Reporter.
Judges
  • BROWN, J.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Guy W. Winn, of Clayton, for petitioner. There was no evidence against the defendant and the affirmative charge requested by him should have been given. Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511; Hobdy v. State, 20 Ala. App. 44, 100 So. 571; Moultrie v. State, 20 Ala. App. 258, 101 So. 335. Where there is no evidence connecting the defendant with the crime charged, this presents a question of law which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court on certiorari. Postal Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief did not reach the Reporter.
Judges
  • BROWN, J.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

TRAWICK v. STATE.

BROWN, J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals states that —

"The evidence in this record has been examined, and we find sufficient facts to authorize a jury in finding the defendant guilty as charged. We further are of the opinion that there is no reversible error in any of the rulings of the court."

Under the uniform decisions of this court, these findings, without more, preclude a review of the Court of Appeals by certiorari. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

TRAWICK v. STATE
(Jan 12, 1928)