Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FRED J. KUSKE v. FRANZ JEVNE AND ANOTHER. Reported in 218 N.W. 99.

Trial court's decision on motion to vacate attachment, reasonably supported by evidence, will not be reversed.

Where there is evidence, by affidavits or otherwise, reasonably tending to support the determination of the trial court on a motion to dissolve an attachment, its decision will not be reversed.

Appeal and Error, 4 C.J. p. 846 n. 3.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy thereunder.

On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N.W. 917, applies.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KUSKE v. JEVNE
(Feb 17, 1928)