AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of JAMES ROSEMOND and Another, Citizens of the State of New York, Complainants, Respondents, against FELIX CORSCADDEN and Others, as the Board of Elections of the County of Albany, Defendants, Impleaded with PHILIP MORRISEY, Appellant.

Order reversed, as a matter of law, and not in the exercise of discretion, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the justice had no authority to make the order, the defect complained of being jurisdictional, and the statute requiring the verification being mandatory; and on the authority of Matter of Swarthout ( 76 Misc. 24); Matter of Murphy ( 189 App. Div. 135), and Matter of King (155 id. 720). Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

See Election Law, § 135, as amd. by Laws of 1923, chap. 597. — [REP.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ROSEMOND v. CORSCADDEN
(Mar 1, 1928)