AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NOMA ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al. v. RAINBOW ELECTRIC MFG. CORPORATION.

In Equity. Patent infringement suit by the Noma Electric Corporation and others against the Rainbow Electric Manufacturing Corporation, in which the defendant set up a counterclaim for unfair competition. On plaintiff's motion to dismiss counterclaim.

Motion granted.

BONDY, District Judge.

It has been quite generally held that a counterclaim based on unfair competition arising out of the sending of notices of infringement of the patent sued on to defendant's customers and threatening them with suit does not arise out of the transaction which is the subject-matter of a suit brought for the infringement of a patent [see Williams Patent Crusher Pulverizer Co. v. Kinsey Co. (D.C.) 205 F. 375; Cooling Tower Co., Inc. v. C.F. Braun Co. (C.C.A.) 1 F.2d 178; Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co. (D.C.) 215 F. 377; Ohio Brass Co. v. Hartman Electrical Mfg. Co. (D.C.) 243 F. 629] and unfair competition cannot be the subject of an independent suit in the federal courts in a case in which the plaintiff and defendant are residents of the same state [see Cleveland Engineering Co. v. Galion Dynamic Motor Truck Co. (D.C.) 243 F. 405; United States Expansion Bolt Co. v. Kroncke Hardware Co. (C.C.A.) 234 F. 868].

The motion, therefore, is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NOMA ELECTRIC CORP. v. RAINBOW ELECTRIC MFG. CORP., (S.D.N.Y. 1928)
(Mar 19, 1928)