Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BOSS READ v. THE STATE.

Possessing Equipment, Etc. — Defective Recognizance — Appeal Dismissed.

Where a recognizance fails to state that the appellant was convicted of a felony, as is required by Art. 817, C. C. P. of 1925, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach and the appeal will be dismissed.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —

Possession of equipment for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The case is before us without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. There is nothing in the record upon which a reversal could be ordered. However, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the case owing to the fact that the recognizance does not comply with the legal requirements in that it fails to state that the appellant was convicted of a felony, such being an essential statutory requisite. See Art. 817, C. C. P., 1925.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

READ v. STATE
(Mar 28, 1928)