Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE L. GLASS AND WIFE, PRINCESS GLASS, v. D. E. MOORE, C. C. MOORE, R. A. MOORE, T. M. MOORE, AND W. P. MOORE, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF D. E. MOORE SONS.

Process — Service — Return and Proof of Service.

The return of process regularly showing service by the court's appropriate officer cannot be overthrown by the testimony of a single witness.

PER CURIAM.

The only question presented by this appeal: Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to attack as officer's return of process purporting regular services? We cannot so hold. All the authorities are to the contrary in this jurisdiction. See Trust Co. v. Nowell, ante, 449.

For the reasons given there must be a

New trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GLASS v. MOORE
(Apr 1, 1928)