Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PRIEST, RECEIVER, v. AMOS, RECEIVER.

APPEAL — Right of Review — Receiver. — A receiver cannot question the correctness of an order directing him to pay a sum of money out of the assets in his hands, and, therefore, he has no authority to appeal from the order.

NICHOLS, J.

The sole appellant in this action is a receiver appointed by the Rush Circuit Court, and this is an appeal taken from an order made in the receivership proceedings by the same court, respecting funds of the receivership in the possession of such receiver. The order merely requires appellant to pay appellee a certain sum of money out of assets of the receivership in his hands as such receiver. Appellant cannot question the correctness of such an order, and has no authority or right to maintain this appeal. Herrick v. Miller, Exr. (1890), 123 Ind. 304; 2 Cyc 641; Stoner, Admx., v. Gloystein (1923), 193 Ind. 614, 140 N.E. 435.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRIEST, REC., v. AMOS, REC
(Apr 27, 1928)