Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. GUY A. LOOMIS and Another, Indi

FRANKENTHALER, J.

Even if it be assumed that the town of Babylon and county of Suffolk could validly assign the causes of action which accrued in their favor, it cannot be gainsaid that the receipt of a valuable consideration would be necessary to make the transfer effective. The complaint, however, fails to allege that anything was received in return for the assignment and for aught that appears in that pleading the transfer was a mere gratuity or donation. Applying the rule that any fair, reasonable and substantial doubt as to the power of a municipality must be resolved against its existence, the complaint would, therefore, appear to be insufficient. Its deficiencies cannot be cured by statements in plaintiff's bill of particulars. The contents of a bill of particulars may, it is true — as a result of admissions therein contained — under certain circumstances render an otherwise good complaint bad, but they can never make an otherwise bad complaint good. The motion to dismiss is granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days upon payment of ten dollars costs. Order signed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AMERICAN SURETY CO. v. LOOMIS
(May 5, 1928)