Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANNA GRAZIDE ALVARADO et al., Appellants, v. FANNIE STANTON, Executrix,etc., et al., Respondents.

WASTE, C.J.

[1] Respondents have made two motions to dismiss appeals. The appellants, as plaintiffs in the court below, instituted two actions against respondents, as defendants, one in ejectment (No. 182,980), the other to quiet title (No. 191,794). Judgment in each case was entered for the defendants. Motions for new trial were denied, but on motion of the plaintiffs the trial court vacated and set aside the judgments and entered new judgments in their stead. Plaintiffs appealed from each of the new judgments, but subsequently the orders vacating the original judgments, and the substituted judgments entered thereon, were annulled by this court on certiorari. ( Stanton v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. 478 [ 261 P. 1001].) The remittitur was filed in the court below January 28, 1928.

Any question raised by the appeals having become moot, the appeals are, and each is, dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALVARADO v. STANTON
(May 14, 1928)