Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE, RESPONDENT, v. HART REFINERIES, APPELLANT.

Opinion: PER CURIAM.

This action was brought by the state against the Hart Refineries to recover the sum of $22,674.03, taxes and penalties due and owing the state under the provisions of Chapter 186 of the Laws of 1925. Defendant filed an answer to the plaintiff's complaint, and the plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, which motion was granted and judgment entered accordingly. The appeal is from the judgment.

All of the questions presented have heretofore been decided adversely to the defendant's contentions, and no useful purpose will be subserved by reiterating our views. Upon the authority of Hart Refineries v. Harmon, 81 Mont. 423, 263 P. 687, and State v. Silver Bow Refining Co., 78 Mont. 1, 252 P. 301, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cause appealed to supreme court of the United States August 6, 1928. Appeal dismissed January 7, 1929.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HART REFINERIES
(Jul 12, 1928)