Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

O.E. HOTCHKISS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY etal., Respondents.

THE COURT.

[1] Petitioners filed an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to settle a proposed bill of exceptions preparatory to an appeal from a judgment against sureties on an appeal bond entered on motion after the affirmance of the judgment appealed from. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 942.)

From the facts alleged in the petition for the writ it appears that, on timely motion, the appeal of the sureties from the judgment will have to be dismissed. ( Duerr v. Sloan, 50 Cal.App. 512, 516 [ 195 P. 475]. See, also, Meredith v. Santa Clara etc. Assn., 60 Cal. 617, 621, and Gray v. Cotton, 174 Cal. 256, 258 [ 162 P. 1019].)

Mandate will not lie to compel the performance of a useless act. The petition is therefore denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOTCHKISS v. SUPERIOR COURT
(Aug 3, 1928)