Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. LARRY NEWSOME.

Criminal Law — Appeal and Error — Prosecution of Appeal under Rules of Court.

An appeal in forma pauperis by a defendant convicted of a capital felony will be docketed and dismissed on motion of the Attorney-General when not prosecuted as required by the rules of Court regulating appeals, after an examination of the record for errors appearing on its face.

STACY, C. J.

This was a criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment found by a grand jury of Wayne County, December Term, 1927, ( S. v. Newsome, 195 N.C. 552, 143 S.E. 187), charging the prisoner with murder in the first degree, and later removed to Chatham County for trial which was held at the June Term, 1928, Superior Court of said county, and resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. From the verdict thus rendered and judgment entered thereon, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, but this has not been prosecuted as required by the rules, albeit the prisoner was allowed to appeal in forma pauperis. S. v. Taylor, 194 N.C. 738, 140 S.E. 728. The motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss the appeal must be allowed. S. v. Dalton, 185 N.C. 606, 115 S.E. 881. But this we do only after an examination of the case to see that no error appears on the face of the record, as the life of the prisoner is involved. S. v. Clyburn, 195 N.C. 618, 143 S.E. 129; S. v. Thomas, 195 N.C. 458, 142 S.E. 474; S. v. Ward, 180 N.C. 693, 104 S.E. 531.

We find no error on the present record.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. NEWSOME
(Sep 1, 1928)