STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. ELIZABETH, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward Nugent, for the
Mr. Edward L. Katzenbach, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward Nugent, for the
Mr. Edward L. Katzenbach, for the

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, respondent, v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 102 N.J. Eq. 221. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. ELIZABETH

STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, respondent, v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, appellant.

Comments