Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

VASSAR HOLDING COMPANY, a corporation, complainant-appellant, v. WILLIAMA. DUNLAP et al., defendants-respondents.

1. A subsequent mortgagee defendant has the right to interpose the defense of usury in a foreclosure suit.

2. Where an estoppel certificate was executed nearly three years after the mortgage was placed on record by the holder thereof, it cannot prejudice the rights of the mortgagee.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Berry in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VASSAR HOLDING CO. v. DUNLAP
(Oct 15, 1928)