AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

S. STROOCK CO., INC. Respondent, v. JOSEPH LICHTENTHAL, INC., Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

We believe the defendant should be given an opportunity to frame his pleadings so as to present the alleged defenses and counterclaims set forth in the proposed amended answer. We do not, however, depart from our former opinion on the merits ( 224 App. Div. 19). The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

S. STROOCK CO., INC. v. JOSEPH LICHTENTHAL, INC
(Nov 1, 1928)