AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

ANNA KAPLAN, Appellant, v. ETTA KOENIG, Respondent. ESTHETIC REALTY CORPORATION, Appellant, and Others, Defendants. Affd., 250 N.Y. 624.

Judgment modified by striking out the provision for an extra allowance of $400, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Under section 1512 of the Civil Practice Act, the plaintiff is the only party entitled to an extra allowance, and the limit allowed is $150. Under section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act an extra allowance "to any party" may be made in a "difficult and extraordinary case." The referee did not certify this case as "difficult and extraordinary."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAPLAN v. KOENIG
(Nov 1, 1928)