Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

A. WEINTRAUB, etc., Appellant, v. M.B. and G.D. DANIELS, etc., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the conclusion reached by the judge of the court below. 30 F.2d 548. In view, amongst others, of the allegations of the petition that the bankrupt was insolvent, and knew of his insolvency, we are of opinion that the judge was justified in his decree, which is hereby affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEINTRAUB v. DANIELS
(Jan 7, 1929)