Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W.M. TAYLOR v. STATE.

(Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Affirmance Where no Briefs Filed. Where no briefs are filed in support of an appeal and no jurisdictional or fundamental error is apparent and the evidence reasonably sustains the judgment, the case will be affirmed.

EDWARDS, P.J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Canadian county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve 90 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in May, 1926. The appeal was lodged in this court in July, 1926. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. We have examined the record and find no jurisdictional nor fundamental error. The evidence reasonably sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAYLOR v. STATE
(Feb 2, 1929)