Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

NILS PAULSON ET UX. v. FRED H. HENRICI ET UX.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to restrain a continuing trespass to real property. The transcript of evidence is not here. The complaint unquestionably states a cause of suit. There is, therefore, no question which we can review. It follows that the decree of the lower court in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAULSON ET UX v. HENRICI ET UX
(Feb 26, 1929)