AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH P. POWERS, Appellant, v. JOHN THEOFEL, DOROTHY A. JULIG and PETER F. ALBRECHT, Respondents.

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the action may be maintained. ( Brown v. Cole, 54 Misc. 278; Cummings v. Bailey, 53 id. 142; affd., 120 App. Div. 892. ) The record shows that the amended rules of the Democratic county committee of Queens county were not adopted by a majority of that committee as required by section 15 of the Election Law. They are, therefore, invalid and their enforcement may be enjoined. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POWERS v. THEOFEL
(Mar 1, 1929)