Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WATSON v. ELLIS

(Syllabus.)

Descent and Distribution — Devolution of Indian Allotment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon authority of Levina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, No. 18265 decided by this court April 10, 1928, 137 Okla. 265, 278 P. 648.

HUNT, J.

The identical question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error herein in No. 17993, Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrister et al., in an opinion by this court filed on the 17th day of April, 1928, 137 Okla. 227, 278 P. 653, following the rule announced in No. 18265, Levina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, 137 Okla. 265, 278 P. 648. Said cases are controlling here and decisive of the questions presented in this appeal.

It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be and the same is hereby affirmed.

LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, CULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

RILEY, J., dissents.

HEFNER, J., not participating.

MASON, C. J., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WATSON v. ELLIS
(Mar 19, 1929)