Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WOOD v. HACKER.

SAYRE, J.

Under the rule obtaining in such cases we are unable to review the questions of fact presented by the petition for certiorari. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. We may add that the record of the Court of Appeals has been read, and we find in it nothing to cause regret that the rule of this court in the matter of review by certiorari is as it is.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOOD v. HACKER
(Mar 28, 1929)