Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SMITH v. STATE.

RICE, J.

Appellant was regularly indicted and tried for the offense denounced by Code 1923, § 5411. The jury trying the case returned a verdict as follows: "We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment." Whereupon, and over appellant's protest, the trial judge proceeded to "fix the punishment" and to sentence the appellant. This was in contravention of the plain terms of the statute (Code 1923, § 5411, supra), which are that one convicted, as appellant, be punished (within certain limits) "at the discretion of the jury." (Italics ours.) And for this unauthorized and erroneous action of the court, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. Code 1923, § 5411; Ex parte Heabern Tanner, 219 Ala. 7, 121 So. 423.

No other questions are apparent.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. STATE
(Apr 2, 1929)