RONIOTOS v. PEERLESS LAUNDRY CORPORATION

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6 Div. 304.

Attorney(S)

Thomas Dozier and Drennen Burns, all of Birmingham, for appellant. In view of the decision, it is not necessary that brief be here set out. William S. Pritchard and John D. Higgins, both of Birmingham, for appellee. The judgment will not support an appeal. The remedy is by mandamus. Ingram v. Ala. P. Co., 201 Ala. 13, 75 So. 304; Brazel v. New South C. Co., 131 Ala. 418, 30 So. 832; Ex parte North, 49 Ala. 385; Ex parte Cunningham, 19 Ala. App. 587, 99 So. 834; O'Neal v. Kelly, 72 Ala. 559.

Judges

BROWN, J.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6 Div. 304.

Attorney(S)

Thomas Dozier and Drennen Burns, all of Birmingham, for appellant. In view of the decision, it is not necessary that brief be here set out. William S. Pritchard and John D. Higgins, both of Birmingham, for appellee. The judgment will not support an appeal. The remedy is by mandamus. Ingram v. Ala. P. Co., 201 Ala. 13, 75 So. 304; Brazel v. New South C. Co., 131 Ala. 418, 30 So. 832; Ex parte North, 49 Ala. 385; Ex parte Cunningham, 19 Ala. App. 587, 99 So. 834; O'Neal v. Kelly, 72 Ala. 559.

Judges

BROWN, J.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RONIOTOS v. PEERLESS LAUNDRY CORPORATION.

BROWN, J.

The appeal in this case is from the judgment of the circuit court granting the defendant's motion for a rehearing under what is generally known as the four months' statute. Code of 1923, § 9521.

It is the settled rule of our decisions that this judgment will not support an appeal. The insufficiency of the judgment to support an appeal is jurisdictional, and the court will ex mero motu dismiss the appeal. Ingram, Probate Judge, v. Alabama Power Co., 201 Ala. 13, 75 So. 304; Ex parte North, 49 Ala. 385.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

RONIOTOS v. PEERLESS LAUNDRY CORPORATION.

Comments